Travellers destroy Thwaites Brewery in Blackburn UK

I know, I know – “they’re people too” and I just “don’t understand their lifestyles”

Spare me.

I’ve had absolutely enough of tip-toeing around subjects that are deemed taboo, due to ridiculous shouts of racism and a lack of empathy for other people’s situations.

I’m going to make it ABSOLUTELY clear how I feel about Gypsies and Travellers –

I respect the fact that you have chosen to live your lives the way you have; if you want to travel around and live from week to week, then that’s your choice. If you are respectful of the fact that people live near to where you park your caravans, then that’s great.

If you don’t –

 – illegally occupy people’s and business’s property

 – harass people walking near to your site

 – let your kids drive Quad Bikes around the local’s gardens or parks

 – let your horses roam free over people’s property

 – leave gas bottles and rubbish strewn everywhere

 – cause damage to people’s property 

then there shouldn’t be a problem.

I’ll give the time of day to ANYONE, regardless of skin colour, creed, religious affiliation or gender choice.

But behave like a moron, and I’ll certainly treat you like a moron.

This story –

comes from BBC News, and highlights exactly why people have such strong opinions on the behaviour of SOME (not ALL – nothing is ALL) Gypsies.

The sheer brazenness of setting up an illegal camp on a working business’s private property, causing £100,000 worth of damage, and then having an aggressive stand-off with Police, as if your behaviour should just be tolerated, is absolutely mind-blowing to the general public.

How do more people in the Gypsy community not see this?

Nobody who treats other people with care and respect should ever be treat poorly, or thrown into the same category as the worst of their community. People who call out ALL Gypsies and Travellers certainly aren’t helping the situation.

However, the ones who are acting in a way that isn’t socially acceptable, absolutely need to be called out; particularly by the Traveller community.

It’s simply wrong that ANY community can be aware of problems within itself and not call those people out. By ignoring or even applauding the bad elements in our communities, we are ourselves to blame for their behaviour.

Any outsider who calls out the poor behaviour of a community is immediately seen as a threat to the entire community as a whole, rather than the poor elements that, in the majority of cases (again, not ALL) the outsider was originally condemning. At the same time, those who call out these bad elements, could do with being a lot more selective about their rage. Saying “all Gypsies” or all anything simply isn’t helping.

Not all of ANY community, race, or religious following is inherently bad.

But the bad elements MUST be condemned – and it must start within their own community first.

After all, a group is only as strong as it’s weakest member.



Transgender woman sues Muslim woman for refusing body wax service

Here we are ladies and gentlemen.

The time has come for the hypocrisy of Social Justice Warriors everywhere to finally be brought out into the open for everyone to see.

This article form the Daily Wire is what I like to call, “the SJW’s Nightmare”.

Think about it –

You’re an SJW. You love to defend Islam at every possible chance. You also love the Trans community, and uphold the rights of people to identify themselves as any of the 5 million+ genders.

You despise Religion (which is weird considering how much you love Islam…) and anyone who refuses to bake a cake for a Gay couple because of their Religious beliefs, should be shamed in the media and lose their business and reputations for life.

So in this case, where a Muslim woman refused to serve a Trans woman, who is the victim and who is the oppressor?

Obviously the Trans woman is oppressed, right? SJW’s remind us all constantly how we must accept Trans people as whichever gender they claim to be, and under NO circumstances must we question it. Biology? Pfft!

The Trans woman, whom according to SJW logic is absolutely a REAL WOMAN and not a man who wants to be a woman, simply wanted to have a body wax treatment. Oh, but the vile, despicable woman at the Salon refused to carry it out as she is “a devout Muslim and cannot touch the body of a man who is not related to her”.

What a damn Transphobe eh? Calling a Trans woman a man, and refusing service citing “deeply-held Religious views”.

It’s the Gay Wedding Cake all over again.

But wait…

The Bigot who refused to wax the body of a Trans woman is a Muslim!

What on earth?!

We’ve been told all of this time that Islam is a tolerant and accepting Religion, and that if you question ANYTHING regarding it, you are a Bigot, an Islamophobe and a Racist!!

Therefore, by SJW logic, the Muslim woman must be the oppressed one.


This vile, despicable Trans woman (or man as the Muslim woman is clearly calling them) has come into her place of work and demanded treatment that she cannot possibly give as it goes against the very teachings of Islam itself. Her sacred beliefs are being questioned and it is NOT acceptable.

How DARE you question her faith?!?

So, SJW’s – quite the pickle we have here eh?

On one hand, you can stand by the Trans woman and defend her right to treatment. She is a woman with rights, and NO Religious ideals should be used to discriminate against her. The Muslim woman is clearly a Transphobic, Religious nutjob who has committed a Hate Crime, and should be punished justly.

On the other hand, the Trans woman clearly doesn’t know HIS place, and needs to stop playing dress-up and respect the Islamic Religion. How dare this Islamophobic-Bigot question this fine lady’s deeply held Religious beliefs? Don’t they know by now that you must never question or criticise Islam?

Dear SJW’s –

Do you see what you have done?

You’ve created this mess by trying to fit everything you find to be marginalised under one huge umbrella of tolerance, and to hell with the all of the aspects that clash with each other – you can just pretend they don’t exist right?

Remember the Gay Wedding Cake debacle? The Christian Bakers who refused to bake a gay couple a Wedding Cake due to their “deeply-held” Religious views? Remember all of the nasty, vile, disgusting things you called them? How you all said they were “Religious fanatics” and “Bigots” and guilty of Hate Crimes?

Now’s your chance.

Tell the “Religious fanatic” what you REALLY think of her. Tell her that she’s a Bigot, guilty of Hate Crimes against a marginalised member of the LGBTQ community and that her Religious views don’t shield her from her crimes.

But you won’t.

You hypocritical morons won’t say a word against the Islamic Religion, and for good reason –


The only Religion that you lot claim to be off-limits from scrutiny is Islam. You’ve been telling us all for years now, that anyone who criticises, scrutinises or simply asks questions about Islam is Islamophobic, and should be shunned. Even when said Religion goes against some of your core beliefs, you fail to address it and instead –  turn your scorn on Christianity.

The one Religion you can’t get called Racist or Bigoted for mocking.

So I’m going to sit back, grab some popcorn and watch as you pull your hair out trying to decide which side of the argument your going to align yourselves with. Because remember – you’re going to upset somebody.

Islamophobia or Transphobia.

Which one will YOU choose?



Female entitlement does not exist – honestly

This story comes from The Mail Online, and just goes to show the absolute stupidity of some people.

This absolute numpty decided that her needs were FAR greater than those of everyone else around her, and decided to drive her car through a barricade of cones, right into the path of a Half-Marathon, endangering everyone participating.

But it’s ok.

In her words she was – “driving slowly..”

Her reason for doing this was simple.

She was on her way to host a “Workshop” and had “no information” about the road closure.

Plus – she was driving slowly

Makes all the difference, right?

So after endangering the lives of several people, giving ridiculous excuses for her conduct and absolutely refusing to accept responsibility for her actions, how does she respond when told by a Plymouth City council Highways official to stop and wait for the Police?

“Well YOU can call the Workshop to tell them I’ll be late!”

You couldn’t make it up.

Privilege exists in ALL aspects of society, not just in Cis White Males. And although she doesn’t explicitly say something along the lines of “but I’m a woman!!” – you know for a fact it’s what she’s thinking.

The fact that hosting a “Workshop” is more important to her than the safety of everyone around her speaks volumes.

Just another “enlightened” soul on the Path to Entitlement.




Contrarianism – Why the Grammy’s was the epitome of Liberal fallacies

Millennials are always playing sensible and completely age-appropriate games nowadays, such as “The floor is lava!” and “Let’s all eat Tide Pods!”, however, they normally last about as long as a Millennial doing manual labour; soon to be replaced by yet another completely grown-up and safe trend.

Keep an eye out for “How long can you keep your hand in the garbage disposal – when it’s switched on?!” any day now…

The game that is currently being played by these little work-shy fops; what I call “The Contrarian Olympics”, is something a little different however. This one has been being played for quite a while now; and there’s no sign of it fizzling out anytime soon. In fact, it’s getting more popular by the day.

Basically, the premise of the game is to take a universally held fact; for instance, that men and women are different in almost every aspect, and then completely flip it on it’s head until it becomes the exact polar opposite. Then, you have to convince people that they have been wrong all along not to believe what you’re saying. This can be achieved in many ways, but the most popular way is to simply call the person racist (even if race is not even involved) and just watch how quickly they’ll believe you! They’ll be marching by your side, placard in hand and shouting to the rooftops about why it’s so important to: “fry pigs in blankets like bacon”.

Like I said earlier, Liberals have been playing Contrarian Olympics for quite some time now, and The Grammy Awards 2018 was a shining example of this.

Riding the crimson wave of the #MeToo and #Timesup movements, the Grammy’s was dubbed as being one of the pinnacles of the “non-white, non-male-dominated”, liberal-soaked, awards carnivals. It was supposed to show that love and respect for women, and people of any other colour than white, were characteristics only shown by people who are on the left of the political and social spectrums.

And it failed spectacularly. Here’s a few reasons why the Grammy’s failed, simply by playing “Contrarian Olympics”:

1) Jay-Z is an “ally” of the oppressed; a champion of women’s rights and a seeker of equality through peace and civility. We should follow his example.

In reality:

Jay-Z once stabbed a man; had a physical fight with his sister-in-law; cheated on his wife; raps about bitches, hoes and faggots; is “all about da bling” (he covets money and riches you dumb-old white guys..) and used to be a drug dealer.

But yeah, let’s look up to him eh?

2) Men are not the focus of the awards tonight; women’s voices have been ignored for too long and tonight is about celebrating them. Women WILL be heard and women WILL be justly rewarded for their work.

In reality:

Out of the 28 main categories, only 1 was won by a woman.


3) Women are more than just sex-objects, and should NOT be objectified in the slightest. We are more than just pieces of meat to be used to sell products.

In reality:

Rihanna; who likes to sing songs about how excited she gets when she sees whips and chains, turned up in a very revealing dress and started hip-thrusting towards Dj Khaled in a “I want you and all of the people watching to dream about having sex with me” – kind of a way.

Oh, and please buy her new record.

But don’t you DARE objectify her.

4) The Grammy’s 2018 is going to show the entire world that our voices will be heard and that we are reaching out to every corner of the globe to spread our message.

In reality:

The Grammy’s 2018 had the lowest ratings of all time, down by 20% from the previous year.

It’s almost as if people don’t want to hear a certain narrative…

In the end, The Grammy’s was a complete and utter failure. Not that any Liberal will tell you that themselves though. Remember; Liberals tend to ignore facts to ensure their own version of events take precedence, and that’s why it’s so important not to get caught up in playing Contrarian Olympics. Just like playing “catch the flaming chainsaw” or “wear a meat-suit while in lion’s cage“; playing Contrarian Olympics will only end in tears.

Facts speak louder than fallacies.

Remember the sky is NOT green and the grass is NOT blue.











Mark Salling – co-stars and fans mourn the death of a paedophile

Yes, you’ve read that headline correctly, cast members and fans alike are mourning the death of known paedophile and former Glee star, Mark Salling.

I’ll say that again: People are mourning the death of a KNOWN PAEDOPHILE.

Salling, who died from a suspected suicide, (though as of the time of writing, this could not be confirmed) was charged in 2015 with possessing and downloading over 50,000 indecent images of children. Pleading guilty to the charges, and facing up to seven years in jail, Salling was due to be sentenced in March of this year after having signed the sex offenders register and entering a “treatment program”.

Because as we all know, being a raging paedophile can be cured…

To me, Mark Salling’s family should be the only ones mourning his death, and even then; the mourning should be primarily about the fact that he died a monster. The fact that former cast members, and fans galore have been mourning his loss is absolutely perplexing to me.

Take this tweet by Matthew Morrison, Salling’s former cast-mate:

Mark Salling, Matthew Morrison

Morrison, who has since deleted the “moving” tribute to his late co-star, certainly isn’t the only person mourning the loss of a convicted paedophile. Scores of fans have been posting their own moving tributes to Salling; all while fully aware of the sick star’s horrific crimes, yet showing no sign of caring.

While I won’t post links or pictures of the tributes in here (due to the ages of the  majority of the posters) I can assure you they are there. Just type in “Mark Salling tributes” in the search bar of Twitter, and you’ll see plenty of posts showing “compassion” and “sadness”.

Thankfully, you’ll also see plenty of condemnation.

Another of Salling’s co-stars – Jane Lynch, was interviewed regarding his death, and while not as fawning as Morrison’s tribute, her response was that of someone remembering the life of an old friend; one who has died from natural causes after living a fulfilling and honourable life. In fact, the closest that Lynch comes to calling out Salling for his heinous crimes is this quote:

“It’s been tough. He was a troubled, troubled guy, and he always was..”

Hardly a damning condemnation eh?

The link to the article in E! News is here:

We all know someone who – “can get you things at a bargain price, so long as you don’t ask where it came from!”

We all know someone who was a “bit of a rogue” in their younger days.

These are the kind of people you can learn to forgive; people who have made mistakes, simply out of desperation or foolhardiness, but who have managed to changed their ways and move on as a person. While they may have caused harm to people, it hasn’t been the kind of lasting harm that effects people for the rest of their lives.

A convicted paedophile however, isn’t someone who can be forgiven.

There are just some lines that can’t be crossed, and along with murdering a child, paedophilia is at the top of the list.

Hollywood has an unsavoury history of ignoring the horrific crimes of some of it’s stars, and it’s always in order to pay tribute to the perpetrators “artistic merit” (see post Roman Polanski won’t be charged with molesting a ten year old)

It’s high time that people; particularly those in Hollywood, stopped paying tribute to monsters like Mark Salling, and remembered him for what he really was:

A paedophile who helped to permanently destroy the lives of innocent children.

If there’s any tributes to be made, make them to the 50,000 victims of Mark Salling’s sick fantasies.








Why the Grid-Girls and Walk On Girls saga will be the death of feminism

Ok Feminists, you’ve finally done it now.

You’ve finally proven to the entire world just how regressive and authoritarian you have become. Anti-feminists have been saying for years how Feminism isn’t about fighting for women’s rights anymore, but that it is now about projecting your world view onto the rest of us Proles. We must say what you say, think as you think, and relinquish all sense of self that we have; all in order for women to RULE THE WORLD!

I mean, you guys aren’t even trying to be stealthy about it anymore. You used to at least try to pretend that it wasn’t about taking power from men, but simply having an equal share of such power. You used to use phrases like “Equality between the sexes” and “feminism is for men and women.”

What a load of clap-trap.

With feminism’s latest attack on “all that is misogynist”, the mask has finally slipped. It’s no longer about women’s rights. Well, at least not ALL women.

I bring your attention to two articles, both of which highlight exactly why feminism has signed it’s own death warrant.

This article from The Sun highlights the story of the Walk On Girls (women who escort the players into the arena) from the Premier League of Darts, being scrapped after the story broke about the infamous Presidents Club dinner at The Dorchester.

(For my take on the aftermath of that story see my post: Presidents Club – why Great Ormond Street are WRONG to return their donations)

The next article is also from The Sun, and brings us the news that Formula One is now axing their Grid-Girls (promotional models used in Formula One) from the sport because:

“We don’t believe the practice is appropriate or relevant to Formula 1 and its fans, old and new, across the world.”

So, the reason feminists are celebrating these decisions?

No surprises for guessing that “the objectification of women” is the top one.

Wasn’t one of the core principles of First-wave feminism, to fight for the rights of women in order for them to be allowed the freedom to make their own choices? I mean, it’s not like feminism is about giving women the right to choose what type of employment they should willingly participate in, is it?

Or is it just the type of employment that most hard-core, extremist, non-conforming, man-hating-anarchists wouldn’t stand a chance of being successful in? Shaving legs, taking care of your appearance and smiling, are generally not something that radical feminists are famous for after all…

Bitchiness aside, I honestly feel that a lot of the negativity towards these type of employment roles, simply stems from one thing – jealousy.

Don’t get me wrong; men get jealous as well.

I’d love to be a strapping 6′ 4″, bronzed, chiselled-hunk of a man, with the looks of Chris Hemsworth and the dick of John Holmes (without the disease of course). My wife would love that too, although she did get excited the other day when watching Thor Ragnarok; when The Hulk came on-screen naked, she started shouting at the TV because she didn’t get to see his: “green Hulk-dick.”

Anyway, I digress…

I’m not however, any of those things, yet I, and most non-feminists (yes, that includes women as well), don’t begrudge people for being beautiful.

We celebrate them.

So what if men are looking at these women because they are beautiful? Do feminists really believe that the women doing this job don’t know that?

Men are often accused of treating women like air-heads, and seeing women as an inferior species who can’t think for themselves. Who’s guilty of that now, fem-tards? You guys are the ones saying that these women, who clearly know what the job entails and who have clearly chosen to do the job in the first place, are being victimised and exploited.

A little patronising, don’t you think?


Also, do women not also objectify people?

Should we ban the use of catwalk models: used solely for the reason that they are beautiful people, thus helping to sell a product?

What about models in beauty-product commercials?

Male and female strippers?

Walk-On Chaperones at awards ceremonies, such as the Oscars?

Actors and actresses?

Pop stars?

These, and many more professions all, to a degree, fall under the same category that Grid Girls and Walk On Girls fall under – the use of someone’s physical beauty to promote a product.

And do you know what else these professions all have in common?

They are all done by people who have CHOSEN to do them.

Two things need to happen here:

  1. The owners of the companies who have ended the employment of so many women, need to grow a pair and stop caving in to such utter nonsense as this. The few don’t speak for the many.
  2. As for feminists and the rest of the PC brigade: just stop. Stop with the idea that’s it’s somehow wrong for humans to be attracted to one another. It’s a part of our nature, and it’s one of the reasons that the human race has lasted so long. The fact that you may not agree with it, doesn’t mean that the rest of us do.

Feminism used to be about fighting for the rights of women everywhere; to be able to make their own decisions, and carve out their own paths in life. Now, it’s simply become a tool with which to indoctrinate and conform; to let men and women know that if feminists don’t like it, then neither should you.

These women are now out of a job thanks to feminism’s new “puritanical” ideals; jobs that these women willingly took part in.

Who would have thought, that feminists would be so against the idea of a woman giving consent and using her right to choose?

Guess what feminists? Men and women alike are all on to you.

In fact, you could say: #Timesup







Man accused of assaulting 3 young girls says he is a “Trans-age” 9 year-old

I can’t quite believe that this excuse hasn’t been used before now.

A 38 year old man by the name of Joseph Roman, is accused of sexually assaulting 3 girls between the ages of 6 and 8. His excuse?

He is a 9 year old boy trapped in a man’s body.

No. I’m NOT making this up.

I found this story in the Chicago Tribune, and as soon as I read the title, I began searching the story to make sure that the guy hasn’t been given any sort of benefit of the doubt. Thankfully, he has been denied bail – yet I wonder: for how long will this hard-line approach last?

And how long before some SJW-types begin to defend, or at least sympathise with him?

I’d like to say that that would never happen. In reality though? I know someone, somewhere is thinking it.

Check out this article from The Daily Mail –

I need to say this: No, I don’t believe that Stefonknee can be compared to this absolutely sick S.O.B who has raped and sexually assaulted three girls. Certainly not in a sense of any wrong-doing. I’m merely trying to get the point across, that people like Stefonknee, clearly need to be helped by professionals who can assist in giving him the therapy he needs; and not by some progressive ideologues promoting the idea that it’s normal for a married man with SEVEN kids to suddenly decide to dress-up and act like a 6 year-old-girl.

It’s not helpful to anyone involved, particularly his children, who are faced with a Father-less future, all because he doesn’t want to “be an adult anymore”.

The more that people promote the idea that “you can be whomever you want to be”; that it’s perfectly normal for grown men to say they are a 6 year old girl, the easier it becomes to ignore the root problems that these people are facing; much to the detriment of the individual concerned, and to their family.

Particularly where children are involved.

It also becomes easier for people like Joseph Romans to latch onto this way of thinking, and use it for more nefarious ways than to just escape reality. For that, you can thank  progressive-types, who are far more concerned with not offending people than with accepting reality in a biological, and psychological sense.

Joseph Romans has latched onto the idea that all Trans-related issues will be treated with sympathy and acceptance; regardless of the reality. That no matter what: you are who you are, and nobody can tell you any different.

Romans is a psychopathic- peadophile, using the good (if not completely mis-guided) intentions of progressives, in order to excuse or at least explain what he has done to these poor girls; and I’m glad that the Judge in this case has so far seen through this.

But I’m not too sure, that if this kind of situation occurs again in the future, that it will always be the case.

“But I’m really the same age as them your honour. We were just playing Doctor. Every child plays that game…”

You just know that this sort of excuse is going to be used by someone in the future to explain their crimes.

I just hope that progressives don’t start to be reeled in by people like Joseph Roman, for fear of offending them.

Stefonknee clearly has psychological issues; issues which I sincerely hope he can get help with in order for him to face up to reality, and to overcome them for the sake of himself and his family. After two failed suicide attempts, (one before his transition and one after) and the trauma being felt by his wife and children, it’s clear that this help is needed sooner rather than later.

Facing up to our fears and problems, especially with professional help, is the most assured way of defeating them. However, hiding from them, and allowing people to believe that they don’t exist; is only going to hurt those involved in the long-run.

Sometimes you have to run the risk of offending people by telling them the truth, in order for people to be able to heal and face up to their issues. Coddling people, and enabling them to live in a bubble of self-made reality, is only going to hurt them in the long-term.

And will be exploited by some.